<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Jacobson Attorneys - Latest Comments</title><link>http://jacobsonattorneys.disqus.com/</link><description>Jacobson Attorneys is a law firm for innovators and other smart people</description><atom:link href="https://jacobsonattorneys.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:16:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-958463495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Yolan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We don't give legal advice on our site but if you get in touch with us directly, we will gladly set up a meeting with one of my team members so she can give you specific and meaningful advice. The easiest way to contact us is through our contact form on this site.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:16:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-958461958</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Paul,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the wording in my contract:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The employee undertakes that he/she shall not without prior written &lt;br&gt;consent of the Employer, either during, or within TWELVE (12) months &lt;br&gt;after termination of this agreement, engage with, solicit business or &lt;br&gt;employment from, whether directly or indirectly, any entity who during &lt;br&gt;the currency of this agreement was deemed as a client of the employer"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does this mean I can't even go for an interview? I wanted to use this more as a bargaining tool for an increase than to actually change jobs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yolan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 06:13:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-958452304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Yolan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Potentially, yes. It depends on the wording of the restraint and a couple other factors but the fact that a client initiated doesn't necessarily mean the restraint won't apply.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-958441943</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can the restraint of trade prevent you from working at one of a your Employers Clients if the Client was the one who initiated?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Yolan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 05:27:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-956086887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dylan&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your question. Generally speaking there is no requirement for a payment in consideration for the restraint. I can't answer your question about the pay advice offhand but we can look into that for you and give you feedback. Please contact us directly through our contact form and my associate, Samantha, will get back to you.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 04:12:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-955639551</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does an employer have to pay a restraint of trade benefit/fee so to speak and reflect that fee on the employees monthly pay advice?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dylan Swartz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:43:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-950304024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That will depend a bit on the circumstances. Perhaps get in touch with us so we can give you specific advice?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 05:53:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-949089440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does a restraint have to be signed by both parties to be enforced and can it be enforced against a consultant as opposed to an employee?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 10:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-949026746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There is no reason, in principle, why a restraint can't be signed once and operate on an ongoing basis. Unless the agreement expires annually, there is no reason why you should have to enter into a new one each year.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:36:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: </title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/articles/2012/7/21/enforcing-restraints-of-trade-an-update.html#comment-949013893</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone happen to know how often a restraint of trade needs to be signed or implemented (Every year?) in order for it to be recognized?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:21:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Consumer Protection Act apply to residential leases?</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2012/03/does-the-consumer-protection-act-apply-to-residential-leases/#comment-564384132</link><description>&lt;p&gt;CPA applies to all. In this case, even if you are not in the "business" of letting property, it is beneficial to the "Supplier" to have access to the Act. It's logical. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nathan Smith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Consumer Protection Act apply to residential leases?</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2012/03/does-the-consumer-protection-act-apply-to-residential-leases/#comment-492245138</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Graeme&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That doesn't make sense to me at all. That interpretation potentially creates a situation where a substantial number of tenants are deprived of the protections afforded to tenants who happen to lease from professional landlords. That is pretty arbitrary when you look at it from a consumer protection perspective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think the distinction should be drawn between leases which have a commercial rationale and those which don't and which include leases between family members and leases without a commercial purpose.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Consumer Protection Act apply to residential leases?</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2012/03/does-the-consumer-protection-act-apply-to-residential-leases/#comment-492239439</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree with your commentary. The CPA would only apply to a residentail lease if it was in the "ordinary course" of the landlords business to let residential property. If he has only one property which he lets, then obviously it is not in the ordinary course of his business and the CPA does not apply. If it is a property holding company that lets property, then the CPA would apply. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Graeme Palmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:09:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Consumer Protection Act apply to residential leases?</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2012/03/does-the-consumer-protection-act-apply-to-residential-leases/#comment-483335431</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that makes sense to me. If a landlord leases a property in an arms-length transaction and makes money off it (even if that is to pay a bond and operating costs), that is still a commercial activity. The clause may not apply to a family member leasing a property to another and charging enough rent to cover levies and other costs but when it comes to general residential leases, I think that should fall into the "ordinary course of business" requirement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It can't be commercial leases only because transactions between juristic persons are excluded and the section's scope would be pretty narrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:49:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does the Consumer Protection Act apply to residential leases?</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2012/03/does-the-consumer-protection-act-apply-to-residential-leases/#comment-483334556</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great article, thank you! Are you assuming that all residential leases fall into the “ordinary course of business“ requirement?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shaun Benater</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 03:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shopping bags and direct marketing</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2011/09/shopping-bags-and-direct-marketing/#comment-373705887</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Interesting; We&lt;br&gt;as customers have to pay for shopping bags ,my question is were does all this&lt;br&gt;millions go and who is responsible for reuse this money?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;kobus@vistarus.co.za&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kobus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 14:29:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shopping bags and direct marketing</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2011/09/shopping-bags-and-direct-marketing/#comment-308450855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andrew&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It helps to have a slightly obsessive and impulse-control challenged personality when it comes to writing posts about topics that I find interesting!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:29:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shopping bags and direct marketing</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/2011/09/shopping-bags-and-direct-marketing/#comment-306482746</link><description>&lt;p&gt;How did you do this so quickly!? Well put. Class action here we come!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andrew Allison</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 03:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>