<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Jacobson Attorneys - Latest Comments in Common creativity at work (part 3)</title><link>http://jacobsonattorneys.disqus.com/</link><description>web.tech.law</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:51:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Common creativity at work (part 3)</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/common-creativity-at-work-part-3/#comment-4520980</link><description>I don't see any reason why you can't use a CC license to license software code.  There are actually specific CC influenced licenses for software.  Take a look at &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-lgpl&lt;/a&gt; as examples.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the most part, CC licenses are intended for more creative works so they do tend to fit very nicely with things like music and writing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 09:51:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Common creativity at work (part 3)</title><link>http://jacobson.co.za/common-creativity-at-work-part-3/#comment-4519735</link><description>Paul, what are your thoughts on the use of Creative Commons licenses for things like software code, and open hardware? Typically licenses like the GPL have been applied to these. Is there any particular reason that the CC license has been applied mostly to things like music and writing?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Duncan Drennan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 07:33:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>